While we’ve had our eyes on the U.S. Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule and Conflicts of Interest Rule, Congress has recommended some new tax laws that might adversely affect the American consumer even more so.
A proposed bill would limit the amount of retirement funds that might be stretched to the next generation or the following generation. The proposal limits the amount a retirement investor can stretch to only $250,000.
This is where you should look at different angles and new ways to attack the problem. Many annuities allow for joint, non-spousal annuitants. The advantage of this set-up is that both annuitants get income for both their lives. This allows annuities to be a vehicle that creates a “stretch-like” provision above the $250,000 of assets under management.
How would your clients and beneficiaries react to being able to do the following?
In these cases, the return on money becomes irrelevant. You are not helping your clients pass along just tax savings or a better return; you are perpetuating value that is important – their family values.
Talk to your clients who have grandchildren. Show them how they could create a stretch provision that is not dictated by tax law. Instead, it is driven by their family values – I think they will find the idea more valuable than any return you could provide. And, it will likely give the family even more than you can ever provide through asset allocation.
Mike McGlothlin is a tireless advocate for the retirement planning industry. As executive vice president of retirement at Ash Brokerage, he heads a team providing income planning solutions focused on longevity and efficiency. He’s also a thought leader who provides guidance and assistance for advisors and broker-dealers navigating marketplace and regulatory changes. You can find a collection of his blog posts in his book, “Above the Clouds … Winning Strategies from 30,000 Feet.”
© 2018 Ash Brokerage LLC.